General Liability
The layer Massachusetts health systems name first, commonly at $1 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate.
General liability coverage
Coverage by State
For agencies already operating in Massachusetts. If a health system contract has just demanded limits or wording your policy cannot reach, that is a solvable problem, and it does not have to wait for your renewal date.
Here is the short answer. When a contract demands limits your policy cannot reach, the fix is general liability at the limit the contract names, professional liability sized to the care you deliver, an umbrella behind both, and certificates carrying the additional insured and waiver wording the contract specifies. We place that through exclusive carrier programs that write home care in Massachusetts, and we do it mid-term when the contract will not wait.
Massachusetts also has something no other state here has: a licensing regime that did not exist two months ago. An Act signed in July 2026 creates the Commonwealth's first statewide home care licensing system, and the rules under it are not written. That is covered further down, carefully.
An agency running seventy-five to a hundred caregivers across Greater Boston, Worcester or the Cape has a different problem from a startup, and this page is written for the former.
No Massachusetts statute sets your liability limits. Your contracts do, and they ask for more than the law.
Hospitals, health systems, skilled nursing facilities, managed care payers and government contracts converge on a familiar list. General liability at $1 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate. Professional liability wherever care runs under a plan of care, often at matching limits. Workers compensation at statutory limits with employers liability behind it. Auto liability covering agency vehicles and caregivers driving their own. Abuse and molestation coverage, increasingly named rather than assumed. And an umbrella to lift the total where the primary layers stop.
Wording matters as much as the number. Contracts routinely ask to be named as an additional insured, for a waiver of subrogation, for cover to respond on a primary and non-contributory basis, and for advance notice of cancellation. Each is an endorsement on a policy rather than a sentence on a certificate.
Greater Boston raises the stakes on both. The academic medical centres and large health systems here are demanding counterparties, and their insurance exhibits tend to be longer and more specific than the norm.
The first route is endorsement. The incumbent carrier will sometimes raise a limit or add required wording mid-term for additional premium, and that is the fastest path where it is available.
The second is an umbrella. Where a contract wants a total your primary layers cannot reach, excess limits stacked over general liability, auto and employers liability usually get there quicker and for less than rebuilding the primary underneath.
The third is re-marketing, where a carrier will not extend or the required wording sits outside what the form allows. That takes longer, which is the argument for sending contract language when it first appears rather than the week it has to be signed.
For a running agency the broker relationship is mostly certificates and mid-term changes. Both are where a placement quietly fails.
A certificate is evidence, not coverage. It states only what a policy already does. If a Boston or Worcester health system requires additional insured status and your policy carries no such endorsement, no certificate can create it. The delay agencies feel there is an underwriter deciding, not paperwork.
So the habit that helps: when a new client, facility or payer sends paperwork, send us the insurance requirements immediately. Certificates already on file should carry over rather than be rebuilt each year.
Adding and removing caregivers does not require a policy change each time, because the program is rated on payroll and headcount and trued up at audit. What needs reporting is a change in the agency's shape.
The payroll audit at the end of the term is worth preparing for. Records split properly by class keep an audit from producing an unwelcome additional premium.
The full program, sized to your payroll, territory and contracts. Each coverage has a page of its own.
The layer Massachusetts health systems name first, commonly at $1 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate.
General liability coverageClinical claims coverage for care delivered under a plan of care, usually required at limits matching your general liability.
Professional liability coveragePlaceable in Massachusetts through the private market, with employers liability behind it, and required by most contracts whatever the statutory position.
Workers compensation coverageFor agency-owned vehicles in dense eastern traffic and on the slower routes out to the Berkshires and the Cape.
Commercial auto coverageThe line most established agencies are short on, covering caregivers who drive their own cars between visits.
Hired and non-owned autoCoverage of up to $1 million for allegations standard liability excludes, and a live concern for a state building an oversight regime around exactly that risk.
Abuse and molestation coverageExcess limits stacked over liability, auto and employers liability, usually the fastest way to reach a total a Boston system contract has just raised.
Umbrella liability coverageBreach response for the protected health information your agency holds: notification, ransomware, regulatory defense.
Cyber liability coverageCover for the office, its contents, and business interruption after a loss.
Home care agency insuranceNon-medical agencies delivering personal care and companion work across the Commonwealth.
Home care agency insuranceAgencies delivering skilled care under a plan of care, often contracting with the large eastern health systems.
Home health agency insuranceBathing, dressing, grooming, and daily living support, the core of a Massachusetts non-medical book.
Personal care services coverageAgencies serving the roughly 1.29 million Massachusetts residents aged 65 and older.
Senior care coverageSkilled, high-acuity care that drives professional liability limits higher, usually with an umbrella behind it.
Private duty nursing coverageResidential group homes combining a facility with hands-on care, carrying premises and property exposure.
Group home care coverageMassachusetts runs on G.L. c. 152, and it does not work the way most states on this site do.
Most states answer the coverage question with a number: one employee, three, five. Massachusetts does not. Chapter 152 works through definitions and through categories it is elective for, rather than through a threshold you sit under until you grow past it.
We are deliberately not printing a threshold figure. The obvious summary source for one was not reachable at a page we could verify, and a number of that kind should not be repeated on trust. The practical position for an agency of any size is straightforward regardless: assume you need the coverage and confirm your own position rather than looking for a number to fall below. Your contracts will require it in any case. Read how the coverage works on our workers compensation page.
Where chapter 152 does speak plainly is on the categories it makes elective, and the drafting is more precise than most states manage. Section 1 provides that the provisions of this chapter shall remain elective as to employers of seasonal or casual or part-time domestic servants, and that for the purpose of that paragraph, a part-time domestic servant is one who works in the employ of the employer less than sixteen hours per week.
Two things follow, both easy to miss. The word is elective rather than exempt, which is a different posture. And the sixteen-hour line defines part-time, so a domestic servant working sixteen or more hours a week in that employer's service sits outside the carve-out entirely. Seasonal and casual domestic servants are named separately.
On whether any of that reaches caregivers employed by an agency, we stop. The provision is written around employers of domestic servants and keyed to hours worked in that employer's service, not around an agency assigning staff to clients. Section 1 does not settle it, and the new licensure regime may change how the question is looked at.
Two more elective points from the same section. The chapter is elective for an officer or director of a corporation who owns at least twenty-five per cent of the issued and outstanding stock, and that applies only if the corporate officer provides the commissioner of industrial accidents with a written waiver of his rights. It is an affirmative filing rather than an automatic status. Separately, students in a school-to-work programme are deemed employees of the participating employer.
This page states no Massachusetts penalty figures and no injury reporting deadline, because the pages carrying them were not reachable to us.
This section is short for an unusual reason: most of what you would want to know does not exist yet.
Until this summer the Commonwealth did not license home care. On 9 July 2026, An Act to improve Massachusetts home care, S.3170, was signed, creating its first statewide home care licensing system. That is seven weeks before this page was written.
What the Act itself provides, in its own terms: a licensure process for home care workers, with the Executive Office of Health and Human Services to create the licensure structure, which would include fingerprinting and background checks, and a check of a worker's driving record if they provide transportation to their client. It requires EOHHS to post a list of licensed agencies online, and makes clear that unverified entities cannot advertise themselves as a home care agency without state licensure. It creates two advisory bodies, the Home Care Worker and Consumer Abuse Stakeholder Advisory Committee, to advise EOHHS on new regulations and safety concerns, and the Home Care Oversight Advisory Council, to advise EOHHS on licensing requirements. EOHHS is to work with the Executive Office of Aging and Independence on surveys and investigations.
Now the part that matters more than any of it. The Act creates a structure; EOHHS has to build it. We have found no published regulations, standards, application process, fees, transition arrangements or compliance dates, and so this page states none. We are not going to tell you what you will have to do or when, because at the time of writing nobody honestly can. Watch EOHHS for the regulations, treat anything that hands you a confident checklist today with real suspicion, and expect this page to be revised as the rules appear.
Medicare covers short-term skilled home health under a plan of care, raising the stakes on documentation and on professional liability.
We will not describe MassHealth's in-home programmes or the state's own Home Care Program, because we could not confirm how they are structured or funded from a source we could read.
What matters commercially is the point this page opened with: your limits are set by the hospitals, health systems and payers you contract with, not by any Massachusetts statute. That is why we ask to see the contract language rather than guessing at a number. If your agency runs skilled care, our home health agency insurance page covers how that program is built. For the non-medical side, see personal care services.
Massachusetts has about 7.14 million residents, roughly 1.29 million of them 65 or older, close to 18.5 percent of the civilian population.
The east dominates. Greater Boston holds about 5.03 million and crosses into New Hampshire. The Providence area, centred in Rhode Island, reaches about 1.70 million across the southern border. Worcester holds about 881,000 and Springfield about 464,000. Barnstable Town, the Cape, holds about 233,000, skews notably older than the state and fills up seasonally.
For an operating agency that produces three different businesses. A Boston book is dense, contract-heavy and driven by the large systems. A western book runs longer distances at lower density. And a Cape book combines an older client base with seasonal traffic that turns a fifteen-minute drive into an hour, which shows up in scheduling and auto exposure alike.
Agency-owned vehicles need commercial auto, and caregivers using their own cars create a hired and non-owned auto exposure a personal policy will not cover on a work trip. Read our New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Connecticut and New York pages, and the full list is on our coverage by state hub.
The sources behind everything above, and a note about what is missing from this list.
We work with agencies that are already running, and their problems are contract problems.
A health system raises its required limits at renewal. A payer adds abuse and molestation as a named requirement. A facility wants additional insured status and primary and non-contributory wording your current form does not carry. A caregiver crash on a Route 128 commute or a summer Cape road exposes how little a personal auto policy does on a work trip. That is why we ask for the insurance exhibit rather than a summary of it.
On Massachusetts licensure we will be less useful than the pages promising a compliance checklist, and that is deliberate. The Act is real, it is recent, and the regulations under it are not written. Publishing requirements that do not exist would be worse than saying so. What we state is what the Act provides, attributed to the Act, with no dates, fees or standards attached, because there are none to attach. The same discipline runs through our workers compensation section, which quotes chapter 152 section 1 and declines to repeat a threshold figure we could not verify.
We place coverage through exclusive carrier programs that write home care risks, and we coordinate the whole program: general liability, professional liability, workers compensation, commercial and hired and non-owned auto, umbrella limits to reach what your contracts demand, cyber, and abuse and molestation coverage of up to $1 million. That reach is backed by working relationships across the home care and healthcare industry, including CareerStaff Unlimited and Genesis Healthcare in staffing and healthcare services, HOMELINK in the medical equipment and home care network space, and Bright Horizons Family Solutions on the family care side.
Answers for agencies already operating under Massachusetts rules.
Usually, and usually before renewal. The underlying general liability limit can sometimes be raised by endorsement. More often an umbrella stacked over general liability, auto and employers liability reaches the required total faster and for less than rebuilding the primary program. Where the carrier will not extend, the program is re-marketed. Send us the insurance exhibit rather than a summary, because the wording matters as much as the number.
The certificate is quick. What takes time is anything it has to evidence that your policy does not yet do: additional insured status for a named health system, a waiver of subrogation, primary and non-contributory wording, or a notice of cancellation. Those are endorsements, not lines typed onto a form. Send us contract wording when it first arrives, not on the day the certificate is due.
Not person by person. The program is rated on payroll and headcount estimates and trued up at audit, so ordinary turnover does not require a policy change. What needs reporting is a change in what the agency does: a new service line, a move into skilled work, a new office, agency-owned vehicles, an acquisition, or regular work over a state line.
That an Act exists and the rules under it do not yet. An Act to improve Massachusetts home care, S.3170, was signed on 9 July 2026 and creates the Commonwealth's first statewide home care licensing system. The Executive Office of Health and Human Services has to build that structure, and we have seen no published regulations, standards, fees or dates. We are not going to tell you what you will have to do or when, because nobody honestly can yet. Watch EOHHS, and treat any source offering a confident checklist today with suspicion.
Nothing licence-specific, because there is nothing to comply with yet. What is worth doing is the housekeeping a new oversight regime tends to reward and your contracts already want: know where your background check and driving record practices stand, keep caregiver records in order, and make sure your insurance program can evidence what counterparties ask for. None of that depends on the regulations, and all of it is easier now than in a compressed window later.
Massachusetts works from G.L. c. 152 and does not turn on a headcount the way most states do. We are deliberately not stating a threshold, because we could not verify one at a source we could read. What section 1 does say is which categories the chapter is elective for, and those categories are narrow. In practice an agency operating in the Commonwealth should assume it needs the coverage and confirm the position rather than look for a number to sit under.
Read the wording rather than the label, because Massachusetts is more precise here than most states. Section 1 provides that the chapter shall remain elective as to employers of seasonal or casual or part-time domestic servants, and defines a part-time domestic servant as one who works in the employ of the employer less than sixteen hours per week. It says elective, not exempt. And the sixteen-hour line means a domestic servant at sixteen or more hours a week is outside the carve-out entirely. Whether any of it reaches a caregiver employed by an agency is a question section 1 does not settle, so we will not answer it for you.
It depends on the line, and it comes up more here than almost anywhere because the Boston metro crosses into New Hampshire and the Providence metro reaches across from Rhode Island. Workers compensation is state-specific and each state your caregivers work in needs listing properly. Liability and auto usually travel, but a contract over the line can demand wording your Massachusetts policy does not carry.
Loss runs for the last five years, current declarations pages for every line, payroll by class, caregiver headcount, the counties you serve, and the insurance exhibits from your largest contracts. Start sixty to ninety days out. A non-renewal shortens the list of carriers, and lead time is what buys the options back.
Tell us your payroll and caregiver count, the states your caregivers work in, and what your largest contract requires. If a Boston system wants wording your current policy does not carry, start there. A specialist will build the program through exclusive carriers that write home care in Massachusetts. There is no obligation.