General Liability
The foundation South Dakota hospitals, health systems and payers expect, commonly at $1 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate.
General liability coverage
Coverage by State
For agencies already operating in South Dakota. If a hospital, health system or payer has handed you a contract demanding limits your current policy cannot reach, that is a solvable problem, and it does not have to wait for your renewal date.
Here is the short answer. When a contract demands limits your policy cannot reach, the fix is general liability at the limit the contract names, professional liability sized to the care you deliver, an umbrella behind both, and certificates carrying the additional insured and waiver wording specified. We place that through exclusive carriers writing home care in South Dakota, mid-term if the contract will not wait.
Two South Dakota details are worth a look on an established program. There is no state licence for a contract schedule, so your certificates carry the whole weight a licence carries elsewhere. And two official state sources point in different directions on the workers compensation mandate, which is a reason for caution rather than comfort.
An agency running seventy-five to a hundred caregivers across Sioux Falls, Rapid City or the rural balance has a different problem from a startup, and this page is written for the former.
On liability the numbers come from your contracts, and they ask more than the law does.
Hospitals, health systems and payers usually require general liability at $1 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate. Professional liability is expected of agencies delivering skilled care. Workers compensation at statutory limits with employers liability behind it. Auto liability for agency vehicles and caregivers driving their own. Abuse and molestation coverage, increasingly named rather than assumed. And an umbrella, which agencies working with the larger Sioux Falls and Rapid City systems often need.
Wording matters as much as the number. Contracts routinely ask for additional insured status, a waiver of subrogation, primary and non-contributory response, and notice of cancellation. Each is an endorsement rather than a line on a certificate.
Here this is the main event rather than one requirement among several. With no state licence and no survey, contracts and payers rather than a regulator define what an agency must carry, so the exhibit is close to the whole compliance conversation.
The first route is endorsement. The incumbent carrier will sometimes raise a limit or add required wording mid-term for extra premium, the fastest path where available.
The second is an umbrella. Where a contract wants a total your primary layers cannot reach, excess limits over general liability, auto and employers liability get there quicker and cheaper than rebuilding the primary.
The third is re-marketing, where a carrier will not extend or the wording sits outside the form. That takes longer, which is the argument for sending contract language when it appears rather than the week it must be signed.
For a running agency the broker relationship is mostly certificates and mid-term changes, and both are where a placement quietly fails.
A certificate is evidence, not coverage; it states only what a policy does. If a Sioux Falls health system requires additional insured status and your policy carries no such endorsement, no certificate can create it. The delay agencies feel there is an underwriter deciding, not paperwork.
So the habit that helps: when a new client, facility or payer sends paperwork, send us the requirements immediately. Certificates on file should carry over rather than be rebuilt each year.
Adding and removing caregivers does not need a policy change each time: the program is rated on payroll and headcount and trued up at audit. What needs reporting is a change in the agency's shape.
The payroll audit at the end of the term is worth preparing for. Records split properly by class keep it from producing a surprise premium.
The full program, sized to your footprint and funding mix. Each coverage has a page of its own.
The foundation South Dakota hospitals, health systems and payers expect, commonly at $1 million per occurrence and $2 million aggregate.
General liability coverageClinical claims coverage for agencies delivering skilled care, where Medicare certification is the only external credential available.
Professional liability coverageThe mandate question is unsettled in the state\'s own sources. The exposure is not.
Workers compensation coverageCoverage for agency-owned vehicles carrying caregivers across long rural routes in winters that make them longer.
Commercial auto coverageFor caregivers driving their own cars for work, which in rural South Dakota is most of the working day.
Hired and non-owned autoCoverage of up to $1 million for allegations standard liability excludes, and in an unregulated market the clearest signal you can give a client.
Abuse and molestation coverageExcess limits stacked on your liability and auto, the efficient way to reach the totals Sioux Falls and Rapid City system contracts require.
Umbrella liability coverageBreach response for the protected health information your agency holds: notification, ransomware, regulatory defense.
Cyber liability coverageCover for the office, its contents, and business interruption after a loss.
Home care agency insuranceNon-medical providers outside Department of Health regulation, delivering personal care and companion work.
Home care agency insuranceCertified agencies whose only external credential is federal, via the CMS-855A route.
Home health agency insuranceBathing, dressing, grooming, and daily living support, including Medicaid-funded personal care work.
Personal care services coverageAgencies serving the roughly 169,000 South Dakota residents aged 65 and older.
Senior care coverageSkilled, high-acuity care that drives professional liability limits higher, often with an umbrella behind it.
Private duty nursing coverageResidential group homes combining a facility with hands-on care, carrying premises and property exposure.
Group home care coverageThis section starts with an honest disagreement between two official sources rather than a clean rule.
The Department of Labor and Regulation's coverage page states that the South Dakota Worker's Compensation Law covers all employers with only limited exceptions. Its employee guide states that it is not required by state law that employers have coverage.
Those may well be reconcilable. An Act can apply to an employer without the state separately mandating that a policy be purchased. But the exact mechanics, and what an uninsured employer forfeits, are not something we can state from the sources we have read, and you should be wary of anyone who resolves it from a summary.
What we will say plainly is this: do not read any of the above as South Dakota not requiring workers compensation. The sources do not support that conclusion, and it is the most expensive sentence an adviser could hand a South Dakota operator. Confirm the position with the Department of Labor and Regulation before relying on it either way. Coverage here runs under SDCL Title 62.
Set the legal question aside and look at the work. Caregiving is physical labour performed in other people's homes: transfers, stairs, bathrooms, lifting, and here a great deal of driving on rural roads in hard winters. Caregivers get hurt, in ways that produce real medical bills and real lost wages. An employer without coverage faces whatever the law does say about its liability, in a state where we cannot tell you with confidence what that is. Uncertainty about a mandate is not certainty about an outcome, and at seventy-five to a hundred caregivers the exposure is not theoretical. Read how the coverage works on our workers compensation page.
South Dakota's household exception is built the opposite way round from most, so read it slowly. The Department excepts domestic servants, unless working for an employer more than 20 hours in any calendar week and more than six weeks in any 13-week period.
The word doing the work is unless. In most states an exemption applies until a threshold is crossed. Here the exception is stated first and then withdrawn: meeting both limbs brings the worker back inside the Act. Both limbs, not either. Whether it could reach a caregiver employed by an agency is a different question the source does not answer, because the text is written around hours and duration rather than who the employer is, so we will not tell you it exempts your caregivers or that it captures them.
The Department also excepts farm or agricultural labour, and one whose employment is not in the usual course of trade, business, occupation or profession of the employer, naming independent contractors including real estate agents and owner-operators of trucks. That second one is the exception an agency might reach for. On its plain words it describes work outside what the employer does, and caregiving delivered by a caregiving business is squarely in the usual course of that business's trade.
Most states leave you to infer their position. South Dakota states it twice, and both statements are worth having in front of you.
On non-medical care, the Department of Health states that non-medical home health providers who provide in-home care such as bathing, light-duty housekeeping, or meal preparation are NOT regulated by it. On the skilled side, it states that it does not require state licensure for certified home health agencies, the route being federal instead: the Medicare enrolment application, form CMS-855A, must be completed and submitted according to the directions provided on the form.
Read those together and the position is unusually clear. Non-medical in-home care sits outside the Department's health facility regulation entirely, and a Medicare-certified agency holds a federal credential and no state one. There is no licence number to put on a contract schedule, because there is no South Dakota licence.
With no state licence to lose and no survey to pass, contracts and payers rather than a regulator define what a South Dakota agency must carry. In most states a licence sets a floor, gives a family or a discharge planner something to check, and gives a broker a category to underwrite against. None of that exists here on the state side. What a client, a referral source or a hospital can verify is your general liability limits, your workers compensation position, your abuse and molestation cover, and whether your certificates describe the work you really do.
One qualification. South Dakota Medicaid, administered by the Department of Social Services, publishes a Personal Care Agency Services billing and policy manual, so Medicaid-funded personal care carries its own provider requirements even though the Department of Health does not license. We will not set out what that manual says, because we have not read it end to end and the detail is the point. If part of your book is Medicaid funded, get it from DSS and tell us what applies.
Medicare covers short-term skilled home health under a plan of care, and here it carries unusual weight: with no state licensure for certified home health agencies, Medicare certification is the only external credential a skilled agency holds.
In most states an agency can point at a licence and a certification. Here there is one document, obtained federally, and nothing behind it from the state. That work also carries the heavier professional liability exposure. For non-medical agencies there is not even that, which is why the limits on your certificates come entirely from the hospitals, health systems, referral sources and payers you work with. If your agency runs skilled care, our home health agency insurance page covers how that program is built. For the non-medical side, see personal care services.
South Dakota has about 925,000 residents, roughly 169,000 of them 65 or older, close to 18.4 percent of the civilian population: a small market with a difficult shape.
Sioux Falls at about 308,000 and Rapid City at about 156,000 are the only sizeable markets, at opposite ends of the state roughly 350 miles apart. The Sioux City area at about 146,000 spans Iowa, Nebraska and South Dakota, a tri-state corner. Everything else is rural.
So an agency here is usually anchored in one of two cities with a long rural reach around it, and one covering both ends is running two businesses separated by most of a day's driving. A caregiver in the rural counties can spend more of a shift behind the wheel than in a client's home, and from late autumn those routes carry ice, wind and short daylight. That distance shapes a South Dakota program more than anything a regulator does, because the regulator does very little.
Agency-owned vehicles need commercial auto, and caregivers using their own cars create a hired and non-owned auto exposure a personal policy will not cover on a work trip. The southeastern corner faces outward: agencies there work across lines routinely, and the rules on the far side are not the very light ones this page describes. Read our Minnesota and Iowa pages, and the full list is on our coverage by state hub.
The sources behind everything above.
We work with agencies already running, and their problems are contract problems.
A health system raises its limits at renewal. A payer adds abuse and molestation as a named requirement. A facility wants additional insured status and primary and non-contributory wording your form does not carry. A caregiver crash on a long rural route exposes how little a personal auto policy does on a work trip. That is why we ask for the insurance exhibit rather than a summary.
On South Dakota specifically, we will not resolve the workers compensation mandate for you, because two official state sources point in different directions and the honest answer is to confirm it with the Department of Labor and Regulation. What we will not do is read that ambiguity as a reason to go without. We also treat your certificates as carrying the full weight a licence carries elsewhere, because there is no South Dakota licence number for a contract schedule.
We place coverage through exclusive carrier programs that write home care risks, and we coordinate the whole program: general liability, professional liability, workers compensation, commercial and hired and non-owned auto built for genuinely long rural routes, umbrella limits to reach what your contracts demand, cyber, and abuse and molestation coverage of up to $1 million. That reach is backed by relationships across the home care and healthcare industry, including CareerStaff Unlimited and Genesis Healthcare in staffing, HOMELINK in medical equipment and home care networks, and Bright Horizons Family Solutions on the family care side.
Answers for agencies operating under South Dakota rules.
Usually, and usually before renewal. The underlying general liability limit can sometimes be raised by endorsement. More often an umbrella stacked over general liability, auto and employers liability reaches the required total faster and for less than rebuilding the primary program. Where the carrier will not extend, the program is re-marketed. Send us the insurance exhibit rather than a summary; the wording matters as much as the number.
The certificate is quick. What takes time is anything it must evidence that your policy does not yet do: additional insured status, a waiver of subrogation, primary and non-contributory wording, or a notice of cancellation. Those are endorsements, not lines typed onto a form. Send us contract wording when it first arrives, not on the day the certificate is due.
Not person by person. The program is rated on payroll and headcount estimates and trued up at audit, so ordinary turnover needs no policy change. What does need reporting is a change in what the agency does: a move into Medicaid-funded personal care, Medicare certification, a new office or territory, agency-owned vehicles, or regular work in the tri-state corner.
The state's own sources point in different directions, so we will not resolve it for you. The Department of Labor and Regulation's coverage page states that the South Dakota Worker's Compensation Law covers all employers with only limited exceptions. Its employee guide states that it is not required by state law that employers have coverage. What we will say plainly is: do not read that as South Dakota not requiring workers compensation. Confirm the position with the Department of Labor and Regulation. Coverage runs under SDCL Title 62.
Set the legal question aside and look at the work. Caregiving is physical labour in other people's homes, involving transfers, stairs and lifting, plus a great deal of driving on rural roads in hard winters. An employer without coverage faces whatever the law does say about its liability, in a state where we cannot tell you with confidence what that is. Uncertainty about a mandate is not certainty about an outcome.
It is built the opposite way round from most states. The Department excepts domestic servants, unless working for an employer more than 20 hours in any calendar week and more than six weeks in any 13-week period. The word doing the work is unless: elsewhere an exemption applies until a threshold is crossed, but here it is stated first and then withdrawn, so meeting both limbs brings the worker back inside the Act. Whether it reaches an agency-employed caregiver is a question the source does not answer, because the text is written around hours and duration rather than who the employer is.
No, and the state says so twice. The Department of Health states that non-medical home health providers who provide in-home care such as bathing, light-duty housekeeping, or meal preparation are NOT regulated by it, and that it does not require state licensure for certified home health agencies either, the route being federal instead through Medicare enrolment form CMS-855A. So there is no licence number for a contract schedule. One qualification: Medicaid, administered by the Department of Social Services, publishes a Personal Care Agency Services billing and policy manual, so Medicaid-funded personal care carries its own provider requirements.
Loss runs for the last five years, declarations pages for every line, payroll by class, caregiver headcount, the counties you serve, and the exhibits from your largest contracts. Start sixty to ninety days out. A non-renewal shortens the carrier list, and lead time buys the options back.
Tell us your payroll and caregiver count, how much of your book sits outside the two cities, whether any of it is Medicaid funded, and what your largest contract requires. If a limit needs raising before your renewal date, say so and we will start there. A specialist will build the program through exclusive carriers that write home care in South Dakota. There is no obligation.